Skip to content

Church autonomy and parental rights challenged in the Americas

#ReligiónLibre

Topic | Parental Rights and Church Autonomy

The decisions of parents regarding how and by whom their children will receive religious education may be disregarded – so ruled the Inter-American Court of Human Rights on 20th April 2022.

ADF International had submitted a brief to the Court. It urged the judges of the Court to uphold the fundamental right of parents and church autonomy as guaranteed by the American Convention and the Inter-American System for the Protection of Human Rights. The brief was supported by more than 30,000 signatories from 18 Latin American and Caribbean countries. This included parents, people of faith of various denominations and other concerned citizens. They signed to express their support for the protection of religious freedom and the rights of parents to direct the religious education of their children. 

Who:
Chilean Churches and Parents

Where:
Chile, Inter-American Court of Human Rights

Advocacy Team:
Tomás Henríquez

Play Video

“We are deeply disappointed in the Court’s decision, which fails to uphold the fundamental character of church autonomy as a safeguard for freedom of religion and belief. Faith communities have the autonomy to choose their teachers and parents are entitled to expect that their children receive a religious education in accordance with their convictions.”

Tomás Henríquez, Director of Advocacy, Latin America and the Caribbean Tweet

Case Summary

Ms. Sandra Pavez taught Catholic religion classes in San Bernardo, Chile. When the local diocese learned that Ms. Pavez had entered a same-sex relationship, contrary to the teaching of the Catholic church, they informed her that they could no longer certify her as eligible to teach the Catholic faith on the church’s behalf. She was, however, able to continue her employment uninterrupted, in a different capacity; even enjoying a promotion to become a member of the school’s management team.   

Despite this, Ms. Pavez took legal action against the Catholic Church in Chile, claiming to have experienced discrimination. When the Supreme Court upheld the church’s freedom to certify its teachers and the right of parents to have their children taught religion by someone who lives in accordance with their faith, she filed her complaint against Chile at the Inter-American Court. The Court has now ruled against Chile and the right of religious communities to decide who teaches on their behalf.

Ruling undermines religious freedom 

The Court agreed that children and parents do have a right to receive religious education, and that it may be included in public schooling to guarantee parental rights. The judgment, however, broke with international consensus that recognizes the selection of teachers as an inherent part of the autonomy of religious communities.  

This decision could directly affect the majority of the continent’s children who receive their education through publicly funded schools. The ruling implies that Catholic, Jewish, Muslim, evangelical or any other faith groups cannot ensure that those appointed to teach that religion live by what they are teaching.  

Disappointment for an unprecedented multi-faith coalition

Over the course of the case, a broad coalition of organizations and religious communities had come together to defend this fundamental right and call on the Court to uphold the State’s laws. This coalition included the Jewish, Muslim, Orthodox, Anglican and Protestant communities from Chile, as well as the head of the Council of Catholic Bishops of Latin American (CELAM), all of whom had filed a historic joint brief with the Court in 2021. In addition, over 30,000 men and women filed a joint petition to the Court requesting it uphold the right of parents to have their children educated in accordance with their convictions. 

“This is a blow to parents, and the religious communities to which they belong. The ruling undermines their right to decide who will teach confessional religious education on their behalf and help raise their children in that faith. The decision failed to align with international law which clearly protects the autonomy of religious communities and stands as an outlier when compared to similar cases decided by other human rights tribunals. Churches play an important role in society, and society benefits from strong and autonomous religious communities. Once the state starts determining who is qualified to teach confessional religious classes, why should the state not also determine which priests and ministers are ‘acceptable’ and, in this way, start to re-write the deeply held beliefs of once autonomous religious communities. While this ruling is a setback for all who care about religious freedom and the rights of parents, we will continue to advocate for fundamental freedoms to be protected across the Americas,” said Robert Clarke, Deputy Director of ADF International. 

Please, partner with us financially.

Your gift can support fundamental freedoms both in Latin America and around the world.

Thank you for your generosity!

Share on Social Media

Related News and Updates

More ADF International Cases

Pastor Keshab of Nepal

Pastor Keshab: Nepal

Pastor Keshab was sentenced to two years in prison and a fine after sharing gospel tracts and praying with fellow citizens in Nepal. He has appealed the ruling and is temporarily free on bail.
Rosa Lalor was arrested for praying silently during coronavirus lockdown

Rosa Lalor: United Kingdom

"What kind of society are we, when people can be arrested simply for peacefully manifesting their faith in public?”

Nada and Hamouda: Sudan

A married Sudanese Christian convert couple is currently on trial facing baseless charges after they converted to Christianity despite the decriminalization of apostasy.