Skip to content

Eweida v. United Kingdom (2013)

European Court of Human Rights upholds freedom of religion for Christian employees

What was at stake?

  • The freedom of religious expression
  • The right to manifest one’s faith in the workplace
  • The right of conscience to wear Christian symbols

Summary

Like many Christians around the world, Nadia Eweida wears a cross as an outward expression of her faith. So when her employer told her to remove her cross necklace or cover it up, she put her faith first and refused to do so. Her decision to stay true to her faith proved costly at first, but with help from ADF International, she won back her right to wear the cross at work.

It was in 2006 that Nadia’s employer, an international airline, told her that she was no longer allowed to openly wear her cross at work. Because the cross held such deep personal meaning for her, she wasn’t prepared to cover it up or take it off. There also seemed to be a disparity in the way that she was being treated, because the airline allowed employees of other faiths to wear religious symbols such as Muslim head coverings and Sikh turbans. As a result of her stand, Nadia was eventually sent home without pay.

Nadia wanted to be treated equally and not only stand up for her own freedom, but for other Christians who faced similar issues in the workplace. ADF International helped her make this stand, funding her case when she took a claim of religious discrimination to the domestic courts in December 2006.

During four years of legal battles, the British courts failed to allow her the freedom to wear the cross. They repeatedly ruled that her request to visibly wear a small cross was not protected by her fundamental right to freedom of religion. The case was then appealed to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in September 2010. ADF International was given permission to make legal submissions to the Court along with other allied organizations.

In contrast to the courts’ stance, Nadia gained widespread sympathy from politicians and the public when her story came to light. More than 100 members of the British Parliament signed a motion in support of her, and the case sparked worldwide outrage and global media coverage.

In a groundbreaking decision, the ECHR ruled in January 2013 that the British Government had failed in its obligation to protect religious freedom as outlined in the European Convention on Human Rights. Nadia was vindicated at last and her decision to put her faith first paid off.

Paul Coleman, Executive Director of ADF International, said, “This is truly historic as it is the first time the United Kingdom has ever lost a religious freedom case before the European Court of Human Rights. We are delighted that the Court recognized that employees must not be discriminated against on the basis of their Christian faith.”

Our Role in the Case

ADF International provided funding for Nadia Eweida’s case and presented legal submissions to the European Court of Human Rights.

Legal Documents

Decision – 15 Jan 2013

Brief – 14 Sep 2011

Stay Informed

Get involved! Sign up to receive updates:

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Name*

Statement of Faith

Based on our adherence to the inspired, infallible, inerrant, and authoritative Word of God in Scripture, we profess with the Christian Church throughout time and around the world the faith expressed in the Apostles’ Creed:

I believe in God, the Father almighty,
creator of heaven and earth.
I believe in Jesus Christ, his only Son, our Lord,
who was conceived by the Holy Spirit,
born of the Virgin Mary,
suffered under Pontius Pilate,
was crucified, died, and was buried;
On the third day he rose again;
he ascended into heaven,
he is seated at the right hand of the Father,
and he will come to judge the living and the dead.

I believe in the Holy Spirit,
the holy catholic Church,
the communion of saints,
the forgiveness of sins,
the resurrection of the body,
and the life everlasting.
Amen.

Päivi Räsänen

Eine Abgeordnete des finnischen Parlaments, die wegen ‘Hassrede’ angeklagt wurde, nachdem sie öffentlich ihre christlichen Überzeugungen zu Ehe und Sexualität geäußert hatte.

Isabel Vaughan-Spruce

Die engagierte Lebensschützerin aus Großbritannien, die festgenommen wurde, als sie still in der Nähe einer Abtreibungsklinik auf einer öffentlichen Straße betete.

Rodrigo Iván Cortés

Ein ehemaliger Kongressabgeordnete aus Mexiko, der bestraft wurde, nachdem er die biologische Wahrheit der zwei Geschlechter verteidigt hatte.

Nada und Hamouda

Aus dem Sudan, deren Ehe von einem Scharia-Gericht aufgelöst wurde und die mit 100 Peitschenhieben und Lebensgefahr bedroht wurden, nur weil sie zum Christentum konvertierten.

Shagufta und Shafqat

Ein christliches Paar aus Pakistan, das 7 Jahre lang in der Todeszelle saß, weil sie angeblich eine blasphemische Textnachricht versendet hatten - obwohl beide weder lesen noch schreiben können.