The Critics (22 July 2022) – Can the state censor conversation on a public street by establishing censorship zones? Should the government have the power to prevent people from being influenced — and penalise those “guilty” of influencing? It all seems like a nefarious concept crawling out from between the pages of an Orwell novel. Yet these are the questions at the heart of the hearing held today before the UK Supreme Court concerning the troublesome Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Northern Ireland) Bill.
Writes Jeremiah Igunnubole in The Critic UK. Read the rest of the article here.
Images for free use in print or online in relation to this story only.
Don’t buffer the truth about censorship zones
The Critics (22 July 2022) – Can the state censor conversation on a public street by establishing censorship zones? Should the government have the power to prevent people from being influenced — and penalise those “guilty” of influencing? It all seems like a nefarious concept crawling out from between the pages of an Orwell novel. Yet these are the questions at the heart of the hearing held today before the UK Supreme Court concerning the troublesome Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Northern Ireland) Bill.
Writes Jeremiah Igunnubole in The Critic UK. Read the rest of the article here.
Images for free use in print or online in relation to this story only.
Would you give today?
Other Commentaries
How the EU Digital Services Act (DSA) Affects Online Free Speech in 2025
Jim Demers: Justice Delayed and Overdue in Canada
Facebook’s Commitment to Winding Back Censorship
Stay Informed
Get involved! Sign up to receive updates:
"*" indicates required fields