Imprisoned for the Faith
Bishop Álvarez of Nicaragua was sentenced to 26 years in prison for “undermining national integrity” and “propagation of false news” for preaching on themes of God-given human dignity and justice, in which he denounced the human rights violations perpetrated by the Nicaraguan government against the Catholic Church, and the Nicaraguan people.
Featured
Imprisoned for the Faith
On trial for the ‘crime’ of tweeting her biblical worldview. That’s the case of Päivi Räsänen, a Finnish medical doctor, active parliamentarian, former Minister of the Interior, mother, a
Bishop Álvarez of Nicaragua was sentenced to 26 years in prison for “undermining national integrity” and “propagation of false news” for preaching on themes of God-given human dignity and justice, in which he denounced the human rights violations perpetrated by the Nicaraguan government against the Catholic Church, and the Nicaraguan people.
Latin America
Application Deadline 31 May 2024
Europe
Application Deadline 15 August 2024
Imprisoned for the Faith
Bishop Álvarez of Nicaragua was sentenced to 26 years in prison for “undermining national integrity” and “propagation of false news” for preaching on themes of God-given human dignity and justice, in which he denounced the human rights violations perpetrated by the Nicaraguan government against the Catholic Church, and the Nicaraguan people.
Featured
Imprisoned for the Faith
On trial for the ‘crime’ of tweeting her biblical worldview. That’s the case of Päivi Räsänen, a Finnish medical doctor, active parliamentarian, former Minister of the Interior, mother, a
Bishop Álvarez of Nicaragua was sentenced to 26 years in prison for “undermining national integrity” and “propagation of false news” for preaching on themes of God-given human dignity and justice, in which he denounced the human rights violations perpetrated by the Nicaraguan government against the Catholic Church, and the Nicaraguan people.
Latin America
Application Deadline 31 May 2024
Europe
Application Deadline 15 August 2024
Don’t buffer the truth about censorship zones
The Critics (22 July 2022) – Can the state censor conversation on a public street by establishing censorship zones? Should the government have the power to prevent people from being influenced — and penalise those “guilty” of influencing? It all seems like a nefarious concept crawling out from between the pages of an Orwell novel. Yet these are the questions at the heart of the hearing held today before the UK Supreme Court concerning the troublesome Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Northern Ireland) Bill.
Writes Jeremiah Igunnubole in The Critic UK. Read the rest of the article here.
Images for free use in print or online in relation to this story only.
Other Commentaries
The Irish “hate speech” bill encourages censorship rather than combatting hate
Germany plans to unveil censorship zones which violate freedom of speech and free assembly
How the UN Undermines Parental Rights by Pushing Gender Ideology
Stay Informed
Get involved! Sign up to receive updates:
"*" indicates required fields