Army vet criminally charged for committing a “thoughtcrime”
- Who: Adam Smith-Connor
- Where: England
- Advocacy Team: Jeremiah Igunnubole
Topic | Thoughtcrime
Adam – a veteran of the British Army Reserves who served in Afghanistan – was issued a fine by local authorities after he was caught praying silently near an abortion facility in Bournemouth, and was questioned as to “the nature of his prayer”.
His offence? Praying for about his own experience, and the son he lost to a decision he made to pay for an abortion 22 years ago. He was praying also for the men and women facing difficult decisions with regard to abortion that day. He stood with his back to the facility, so as not to be misconstrued as trying to disrupt the privacy of anyone there. But a local regulation banned prayer as an “expression of approval or disapproval of abortion” on that public street. Now, authorities are arguing that that ban also applies to silent prayer.
"It isn’t for the authorities to determine the contents of my thoughts on this matter [abortion], on a public street”
- Adam Smith-Connor
Case summary
A censorship zone or so-called “buffer zone” has been in place in Bournemouth since last October. The zone was implemented by local authorities through a Public Spaces Protection Order (PSPO) which criminalises engaging in “an act” or even “attempted act” of “approval/disapproval, with respect to issues related to abortion services, by any means.
This includes but is not limited to “graphic, verbal or written means, prayer or counselling” within an area surrounding the abortion facility. The PSPO further prohibits religious acts, including reading scripture, praying or crossing oneself.
Adam refused to pay his fine because he does not believe it can be illegal to pray in a public space in the UK – let alone in the privacy of one’s mind.
We’re supporting Adam’s legal defense because freedom of thought, and freedom of religion, are protected absolutely through the Human Rights Act. The local authority – Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council- therefore has no power to introduce a prohibition on silent prayer.
“In permitting the prosecution of silent prayer, we are sailing into dangerous waters regarding human rights protections in the UK. Censorship zones are inherently wrong and engender unhelpful legal confusion regarding the right to free thought. Both domestic and international law have long established freedom of thought as an absolute right that must not ever be interfered with by the state,” said Jeremiah Igunnubole, legal counsel for ADF UK, the organisation supporting Adam Smith-Connor’s legal defense.
Adam’s trial will take place in November, marking the third “thought trial” of this nature in 2023.
Read all about the cases of Isabel Vaughan-Spruce and Father Sean Gough, both of whom were prosecuted for praying silently in their heads in an abortion facility “censorship zone” in Birmingham. Both have been found innocent in court, with the support of ADF UK.
Support Freedom of Thought
Your gift can support fundamental freedoms for Adam and others like him across the world. Thank you for your generosity.
Stay Informed
Get involved! Sign up to receive updates:
"*" indicates required fields