Skip to content
Rodrigo Iván Cortés

Mexican court fails to uphold free speech


Mexico: Civil Society leader Rodrigo Iván Cortés has been CONVICTED of “gender-based political violence” for tweets. Court orders reparation measures.

Topic | Freedom of Speech

Rodrigo Iván Cortés, civil society leader and former Mexican Congressman, has been convicted of “gender based political violence,” including digital violence, over social media posts on Twitter and Facebook referring to transgender-identifying Mexican Congressional representative, Salma Luévano, as a “man who self-ascribes as a woman”. 

Political advocacy group Frente Nacional por la Familia (“National Front for the Family” or “FNF”), which is headed by Cortés, expressed concern on both Twitter and Facebook after Luévano presented a bill in the Mexican Congress to penalize Christian views on sexuality as a form of “hate speech”. As a response to the social media posts, Luévano alleged a violation of “identity rights,” leading to Cortés being charged and convicted as a violent political offender—a clear violation of his fundamental right to free speech. 

After appealing his case, Cortés was convicted of “gender-based political violence” for his tweets, and the Court has ordered reparation measures, including that including that Cortés publish daily apologies on social media and be listed on a national registry of offenders. ADF International is supporting his appeal at the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights.

Rodrigo Iván Cortés


Advocacy Team:
Kristina Hjelkrem, Tomás Henríquez

“I look forward to obtaining justice and securing mine and every other Mexican citizen’s right to freedom of speech. No laws should be used to silence or punish individuals for peacefully sharing their convictions. I look forward to the day when all Mexicans can share their opinions without fear of persecution”

Case Summary

Rodrigo Iván Cortés is a former member of the Mexican Congress and leader of political advocacy organization Frente Nacional por la Familia (“National Front for the Family” or “FNF”).  

Beginning in September 2022, the FNF expressed concern on Twitter that a bill presented by Salma Luévano, a Congressional representative who identifies as transgender, constituted a grave violation of the rights to freedom of speech and religious freedom in Mexico.

The bill aimed to penalize the propagation of Christian teaching on sexuality as a form of “hate speech”. It garnered significant attention when Luévano presented the bill wearing the vestments of a Catholic bishop. 

Luévano filed a complaint against Cortés, arguing that a series of 9 social media posts on Twitter and Facebook constituted a violation of the right to be acknowledged as a woman and a “denial of identity”. Mexico’s Specialized Regional Chamber of the Electoral Tribunal of the Federal Judicial Power found that the posts constituted gender-based political violence, as well as digital, symbolic, psychological, and sexual violence against Luévano. The Chamber held that criticizing a transgender woman constitutes “undermining the political and electoral rights of women, and the unencumbered exercise of their public office”. This lower court ruling has been appealed to the Superior Chamber of the Electoral Tribunal of the Federal Judicial Power (the highest constitutional court of the country for electoral issues), which is the court of last instance in Mexico for Cortés’ case. A judgment is expected soon.

Luévano, together with transgender-identifying representative María Clemente, has gained notoriety for fomenting unrest within Mexico’s Congress, including an incident where Clemente, supported by Luévano, physically wrestled with the president of the chamber to force him into relinquishing control of a congressional meeting in an attempt to force the expulsion of another lawmaker. Clemente also prompted international outrage by Tweeting explicit videos of Clemente’s own “sex work,” citing a right to freely share this kind of content on digital platforms. 

Luévano and Clemente are members of the MORENA party, which has promoted constitutional amendments to enshrine “sexual rights,” without age distinctions, which would include minors; a proposal that the FNF criticized in one of the social media posts.  

Like Cortés, Mr. Gabriel Quadri, a federal Congressman in Mexico, was accused of “gender-based political violence” for his Tweets regarding transgender ideology and fairness for women. Quadri expressed concern that men identifying as women are claiming spots reserved for women in Mexico’s Congress. He has been criminally charged for this following an accusation by Salma Luévano.

The Superior Chamber of the Federal Electoral Court rejected Mr. Quadri’s appeal and confirmed the sanction imposed by the lower court, forcing him to delete the tweets, pay a fine, issue a public apology, and registering him as a “gender based political offender”. ADF International submitted a petition to the Inter American Commission for Human Rights for Quadri’s right to free speech. He is waiting for the Commission to declare the case admissible.   

Disagreement is not discrimination, and peaceful dissent should never be penalized as violence. It is deeply disturbing that Cortés, who is exercising his right to peaceably share his views on a matter of significant current debate, has been convicted as a violent political offender when in fact it is his opponents that have a history of perpetuating unrest within Mexico’s political institutions,” stated Kristina Hjelkrem, legal counsel for ADF International, which is providing legal support to Cortés’ defense. 

“Free speech is greatly threatened in Mexico at this time, and it has hit a crisis point with courts imposing severe censorship sanctions for the peaceful expression of views as evidenced by this egregious case. Unfortunately, Cortés’ case is far from an isolated incident,” said Hjelkrem. 

“More and more, we are seeing the Mexican government violate its citizens’ fundamental and constitutional right to freedom of speech. Cortés spoke out, peacefully, in support of self-evident truth, and for that, he has been convicted as a violent offender and subjected to onerous punishments. Censorship is not compatible with a free society,” Hjelkrem added. 

Related News and Updates

More ADF International Cases

Päivi standing outside

Päivi Räsänen: Finland

Meet the grandmother and Member of Parliament who never thought she'd face criminal charges for sharing her deeply held beliefs in public.
Christian in front of flag

Christian Cortez Pérez: Mexico

Students should not fear for their careers when they voice their views in an academic setting.

Zavod ŽIVIM: Slovenia

Can state-owned service providers pull down ads that authorities decide they don’t like? In Slovenia, a state-owned bus company removed ads commissioned by the pro-life NGO Zavod ŽIV!M.

Get Involved! Sign Up to Receive Updates:

"*" indicates required fields


Should religious freedom be protected in times of crisis?

“I support freedom of religious belief as a basic human right that deserves the highest level of protection.

I stand up against worship bans which are illiberal and non-democratic. Blanket bans on public worship are incompatible with the international human right to the communal exercise of religious freedom. Fundamental freedoms apply to all, and they must be protected rather than weakened in times of crisis.”