- « Censorship undermines democracy, suppresses political opponents, and degrades public safety », reads U.S. State Dept. statement calling out Australia’s censorship of Canadian campaigner « Billboard Chris » (Chris Elston)
- Elston legally challenged the Australian eSafety Commissioner for censoring his post on gender ideology last month. ADF International supported the case
Washington, D.C. (3 May 2025) â The U.S. State Department’s Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, & Labor has called out foreign governments who « coerce » U.S. social media platforms to censor users for speaking the truth.
Listed as an example of such « concerning » behaviour is the decision of the Australian eSafety Commissioner to require Muskâs đ to censor Canadian campaigner âBillboard Chrisâ (Chris Elston), who posted a criticism of gender ideology, and used biologically accurate pronouns to describe an Australian âtransgenderâ activist, in a now âgeo-blockedâ post in 2024.Â
Elston is a public campaigner against puberty blockers being given to children.
âIf our free speech can't be protected when we speak out against the greatest child abuse scandal in the world right now, when can it be?â
Reacting to the news of the State Departmentâs intervention, Chris Elston (âBillboard Chrisâ) said:
âItâs tremendous to have the State Department support what we all know is true: free speech is a fundamental right, critical to a democratic society.
If our free speech canât be protected when we speak out against the greatest child abuse scandal in the world right now, when can it be?â
Both đ and Billboard Chris, who was supported by ADF International and the Australian Human Rights Law Alliance, legally challenged the decision in Melbourne last month. The result is expected in the second half of this year.
The State Department’s statement, released on social media, reads:
« The Department of State is deeply concerned about efforts by governments to coerce American tech companies into targeting individuals for censorship. Freedom of expression must be protected â online and offline.
« Examples of this conduct are troublingly numerous. EU Commissioner Thierry Breton threatened X for hosting political speech; TĂŒrkiye fined Meta for refusing to restrict content about protests; and Australia required X to remove a post criticizing an individual for promoting gender ideology.
« Even when content may be objectionable, censorship undermines democracy, suppresses political opponents, and degrades public safety. The United States opposes efforts to undermine freedom of expression. As @SecRubio said, our diplomacy will continue to place an emphasis on promoting fundamental freedoms. »
Australia censored post using biologically accurate pronouns to describe "transgender" activist
The Australian eSafety Commissioner defended the decision to censor Elston’s post before a Tribunal in Melbourne last month by arguing that a post using the biologically accurate pronouns of a transgender activist was âlikely âŠintended to have an effect of causing serious harmâ and should therefore be subject to state-enforced censorship, in accordance with Australia’s Online Safety Act.
The post in question, which was subject to a âremoval noticeâ at the hands of the eSafety Commissioner in April 2024, shared a Daily Mail article headlined âKinky secrets of UN trans expert REVEALED: Australian activist plugs bondage, bestiality, nudism, drugs, and tax-funded sex-change ops – so why is he writing health advice for the world body?â and which included pictures posted on social media by transgender activist, and WHO expert panel appointee, Teddy Cook. Â
In February 2024, Canadian internet sensation and childrenâs safety campaigner âBillboard Chrisâ (Chris Elston), took to U.S. social media platform âXâ to share the article, adding the comment:Â
âThis woman (yes, she’s female) is part of a panel of 20 ‘experts’ hired by the @WHO to draft their policy on caring for ‘trans people. »Â
âPeople who belong in psychiatric wards are writing the guidelines for people who belong in psychiatric wards.âÂ
The takedown order was legally challenged by Elon Muskâs platform âXâ, and by Elston. ADF International and the Human Rights Law Alliance are supporting Elstonâs legal case. Â
In his evidence, Elston told the Tribunal that while the first sentence of the tweet was a specific comment to the Daily Mailâs story on Teddy Cook, his second sentence was intended more broadly, to make a political comment about the ideological bias present amongst those in positions of power and influence when it comes to writing gender policy around the world.Â
Speaking on the witness stand, Elston added:Â
âItâs damaging to teach children they are born in the wrong bodyâŠchildren are beautiful just as they are. No drugs or scalpels needed.âÂ
Asked further about why he chose to post on this matter, Elston explained: âBecause the World Health Organisation has global influence. We should have evidence-based care.âÂ
Freedom of political communication is protected as an implied right under the Australian Constitution.Â
Robert Clarke, Director of Advocacy for ADF International, which is backing Elstonâs legal defence, said:Â
âThe decision of Australian authorities to prevent Australian citizens from hearing and evaluating information about gender ideology is a patronizing affront to the principles of democracy. Â
âThe confidence of the Australian eSafety commissioner to censor citizens of Canada on an American platform, shows the truly global nature of the free speech crisis.Â
âSpeaking up for free speech is critical at this juncture, and weâre proud to be backing Billboard Chris as he does just that.â Â
Members of the public are invited to support Chrisâs legal case here: https://adfinternational.org/campaign/support-billboard-chris  Â
Images for free use in print or online in relation to this story only
Pictured: « Billboard Chris » (Chris Elston); Chris Elston with the ADF International team supporting his case
