Skip to content

WHO Adopts Pandemic Treaty Without Censorship Provisions 

  • Final treaty text drops earlier references to “misinformation” and “infodemic management,” safeguarding free expression.
  • Adoption follows more than three years of contentious negotiations and global debate 

20 May 2025 (GENEVA) – Today, the World Health Assembly adopted the WHO Pandemic Agreement. The Pandemic Agreement is a binding instrument of international law created to set a global standard for pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response. 

In April 2025, a World Health Organization intergovernmental negotiating body concluded over three years of negotiations by finalizing a draft of the treaty. The finalized draft was subsequently submitted for consideration at the 78th World Health Assembly, where it was adopted today. 

Earlier drafts of the agreement included references to managing “infodemics,” defined as “too much information,” and countering and preventing “mis- and disinformation”—language that raised serious freedom of expression concerns. The final version excludes such provisions, instead recognizing the importance of trust and transparency in pandemic communication. It further contains sovereignty protections regarding the ability of States to implement public health measures. 

“ADF International commends Member States for addressing our concerns by removing earlier provisions on so-called ‘infodemic’ management and ‘mis- and disinformation’ prevention that could have undermined freedom of expression and potentially enabled widespread censorship.”

“We welcome the Pandemic Agreement’s commitment to open communication over speech suppression as an essential requirement for any effective pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response strategy. As adopted, this new treaty does not undermine the protections for free speech firmly enshrined in international law.

The agreement will be opened for signature only after the adoption of a yet-to-be-negotiated annex on the Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing (PABS) System, which will govern the sharing of pathogen data and the equitable distribution of resulting benefits. 

Background: Threat to Free Speech

The Pandemic Agreement process commenced in December 2021 and did not conclude as initially planned in May 2024 due to persistent disagreements between Member States on key issues. Throughout the negotiation process, ADF International conducted legal advocacy, including at the United Nations and U.S. Congress, with the goal of removing or amending provisions that could have been used to suppress lawful speech. 

Specifically, earlier versions of the text called for managing “infodemics” and combating and preventing “misinformation and disinformation” without clear definitions, potentially granting authorities broad discretion to limit free expression. 

In its United Nations advocacy, both with government delegations negotiating the agreement at the World Health Organization in Geneva and in national capitals, ADF International argued that such provisions misrepresented the human right to freedom of expression as a threat to public health.   

Access to transparent and accurate information is essential during health emergencies. Governments should never be granted the license to restrict lawful speech under the guise of shielding the public from information that may be arbitrarily labeled as ‘misinformation’ or ‘disinformation’. The adoption of this legally binding instrument of international law without any censorship language is a significant relief for all who are concerned with the protection of the basic human right to free speech,” stated Mazzoli. 

Images for free use in print or online in relation to this story only. 

Pictured: Giorgio Mazzoli

Wollen Sie diesen und weitere Fälle unterstützen?

Ihre Spende hilft:

Die Kosten für die juristische Verteidigung von grundlegenden Freiheiten zu decken.

family icon

Hunderte von Mandanten rechtlich zu unterstützen.

Den Einsatz für gerechte Gesetze, Urteile und Entscheidungen weltweit zu ermöglichen.

Bleiben Sie informiert

Melden Sie sich für unseren Newsletter an

*“ zeigt erforderliche Felder an

Dieses Feld dient zur Validierung und sollte nicht verändert werden.
Name*

Statement of Faith

Based on our adherence to the inspired, infallible, inerrant, and authoritative Word of God in Scripture, we profess with the Christian Church throughout time and around the world the faith expressed in the Apostles’ Creed:

I believe in God, the Father almighty,
creator of heaven and earth.
I believe in Jesus Christ, his only Son, our Lord,
who was conceived by the Holy Spirit,
born of the Virgin Mary,
suffered under Pontius Pilate,
was crucified, died, and was buried;
On the third day he rose again;
he ascended into heaven,
he is seated at the right hand of the Father,
and he will come to judge the living and the dead.

I believe in the Holy Spirit,
the holy catholic Church,
the communion of saints,
the forgiveness of sins,
the resurrection of the body,
and the life everlasting.
Amen.

Päivi Räsänen

Päivi Räsänen, a member of parliament and devoted grandmother from Finland, charged with 'hate speech' for voicing her deeply held beliefs on the Christian view of marriage and sexuality.

Isabel Vaughan-Spruce

Die engagierte Lebensschützerin aus Großbritannien, die festgenommen wurde, als sie still in der Nähe einer Abtreibungsklinik auf einer öffentlichen Straße betete.

Rodrigo Iván Cortés

Ein ehemaliger Kongressabgeordnete aus Mexiko, der bestraft wurde, nachdem er die biologische Wahrheit der zwei Geschlechter verteidigt hatte.

Nada und Hamouda

Aus dem Sudan, deren Ehe von einem Scharia-Gericht aufgelöst wurde und die mit 100 Peitschenhieben und Lebensgefahr bedroht wurden, nur weil sie zum Christentum konvertierten.

Shagufta und Shafqat

Ein christliches Paar aus Pakistan, das 7 Jahre lang in der Todeszelle saß, weil sie angeblich eine blasphemische Textnachricht versendet hatten - obwohl beide weder lesen noch schreiben können.

Adah

Adah had to flee her home after being threatened by her family for her conversion and obtained a protective order in another state.

Pastor Ezekiel

Pastor Ezekiel was captured and tortured by unidentified men for two weeks in February 2024, and then handed over to the police, who released him.

David

David was captured and tortured by unidentified men for two weeks in February 2024, and then handed over to the police, who charged him with kidnapping and obtained a conviction without a lawyer in 3 days. In July, the High Court in Northern Nigeria overturned his wrongful conviction. He is now free.

Naomi

Naomi had to flee her home after being threatened by her family for her conversion, and obtained a protective order in another state.

Rhoda Jatau

Nigerian Christian mother of 5, Rhoda Jatau, has been acquitted after being imprisoned for 19-months for allegedly sharing a video on WhatsApp.

You are currently viewing a placeholder content from YouTube. To access the actual content, click the button below. Please note that doing so will share data with third-party providers.

More Information

Yahaya Sharif-Aminu

In March 2020, a dangerous mob burned down his house and the Hisbah religious police, an official authority in charge of enforcing Sharia law, arrested Yahaya. Shortly after, the young man was convicted in a Sharia court for his alleged “blasphemy” and sentenced to death by hanging. His Supreme Court appeal has the potential to overturn Sharia-based blasphemy laws in Northern Nigeria.