Religious Freedom Coalition Thanks President Trump for Designating Nigeria „Country of Particular Concern;” Proposes Next Steps to Protect Persecuted Christians“

  • In letter thanking President Trump, coalition of international religious freedom experts and faith leaders outlines key recommendations to respond to crisis facing persecuted Christians in Nigeria.

  • ADF International joins the call, urging continued U.S. leadership and global action to defend religious freedom in Nigeria and beyond.

WASHINGTON D.C. (November 13) — A coalition of 48 faith leaders and religious freedom experts has sent a letter to U.S. President Donald Trump, thanking him for his decisive action in designating Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern (CPC), stating, “You saw the evidence, you listened to the cries of the persecuted, and you acted.”  

The letter urges continued United States’ leadership on international religious freedom. In it, signatories emphasize that swift action from the U.S. is indispensable as Christians in Nigeria continue to face relentless violence from terrorist groups. The letter reflects a unified commitment to four recommended key policy goals that Nigeria, following increased pressure from the U.S., should commit to if it is to be removed from the CPC designation: 1) increased security and reliable early warning systems for Christian communities, particularly in the Middle Belt where Fulani militant attacks are the worst; 2) swift prosecution for attackers; 3) facilitating the safe return of internally-displaced persons; and 4) repealing the country’s draconian Sharia blasphemy laws. 

“The administration’s decision to redesignate Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern is a momentous step forward for international religious freedom,” said Sean Nelson, Senior Counsel for ADF International. “Christians and other vulnerable communities in Nigeria have endured unthinkable violence for far too long. While there is still much work ahead, this decisive action renews hope that real protection and accountability are on the horizon. The President’s commitment to Nigeria can serve as a model to protect persecuted Christians worldwide, as Christians are the most persecuted religious group globally.”

“The administration’s decision to redesignate Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern is a momentous step forward for international religious freedom. While there is still much work ahead, this decisive action renews hope that real protection and accountability are on the horizon. The President’s commitment to Nigeria can serve as a model to protect persecuted Christians worldwide, as Christians are the most persecuted religious group globally."

- Sean Nelson, Senior Counsel for Global Religious Freedom at ADF International

Signatories to the letter include top leaders in the movement to end global Christian persecution, including Alliance Defending Freedom President & CEO Kristen Waggoner, Matt and Mercedes Schlapp of the CPAC Foundation, former Congressman Frank Wolf, former Senior Advisor to the President on International Religious Freedom Sarah Makin, President of Family Research Council and former Chair of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom Tony Perkins, President & CEO of Concerned Women for America Penny Nance, President & CEO of CatholicVote Kelsey Reinhardt, Director of the Hudson Institute’s Center for Religious Freedom Nina Shea, and many others. The letter was developed through the CPAC Christian Persecution Coalition. In addition to highlighting the crisis in Nigeria, the letter urges President Trump to „continue to make the defense of religious freedom internationally a core U.S. foreign policy priority” and to “continue and even elevate” the defense of persecuted Christians worldwide. 

“We commend your recognition of the major threat and devastation facing Christians in Nigeria from radical Islamists and a government that has taken little action to protect them, as well as your clear-eyed statements placing all available Presidential actions on the table to ensure that action is taken soon,” the letter reads.

Christian Persecution in Nigeria

Nigeria remains one of the most dangerous places in the world to be a Christian. In 2025 alone, more than 7,000 Christians have been killed for their faith, with an average of 35 murdered every single day. Since Boko Haram launched its insurgency in 2009, estimates indicate that between 50,000 and 100,000 Christians have lost their lives due to religiously motivated violence. 

The destruction of churches has become a defining feature of the crisis, with over 19,000 churches attacked or destroyed in recent years. In the central regions of Benue and Plateau States the situation has worsened dramatically, with more than 9,500 people, mostly Christians, killed between May 2023 and May 2025, and around 500,000 individuals newly displaced from their homes due to targeted attacks. 

“The numbers we have seen in Nigeria are alarming. With the renewed CPC designation for Nigeria, we are hopeful that this will bring about real change. The letter to the president, which ADF International gladly has joined, acknowledges the horrors that Christians have faced for years and paints a picture of what a path toward protecting them and religious freedom for all can look like,” said Kelsey Zorzi, Director of Advocacy for ADF International.  

Advocacy for Nigeria’s Persecuted Christians

ADF International continues to advocate for Christians and other religious minorities who face severe persecution across Nigeria. The organization has supported multiple individuals targeted under blasphemy laws or attacked for their faith. 

One such case is that of Rhoda Jatau, a Christian mother imprisoned for 19 months after allegedly sharing a video condemning the brutal lynching of Christian college student Deborah Emmanuel Yakubu. With legal support from ADF International, Jatau was fully acquitted in December 2024, marking an important victory for justice and free expression. 

ADF International also backed the successful appeal of *David (name changed for security reasons)*, a Christian man who was wrongfully convicted and suffered torture after helping a convert escape violent threats. A Nigerian High Court ultimately overturned his conviction, acknowledging the injustices he endured. 

Today, ADF International continues its support for Yahaya Sharif-Aminu, a Sufi musician imprisoned for over five years after a WhatsApp message deemed blasphemous. Once sentenced to death, Sharif-Aminu is now awaiting his next hearing before the Supreme Court of Nigeria, and his case may be heard and decided in the coming months. Sharif-Aminu’s case has the potential to abolish Nigeria’s harsh blasphemy laws, which embolden mob violence and fuel the climate of hostility facing Christians and other vulnerable groups.

Global Advocacy for Persecuted Christians

The coalition letter underscores that the crisis in Nigeria reflects a broader global trend of growing hostility toward Christians. ADF International supports numerous cases across the world, advocating for the right to freely live out one’s faith. 

The letter states, “We see atrocities and grave violations being committed worldwide, from Nicaragua to the Democratic Republic of Congo and Sudan, from Algeria to Syria to China, and in so many other places.” In Nicaragua, ADF International has represented  Christian pastors punished for their faith. In Sudan, the organization has advocated for Christians targeted for conversion to the faith. The letter also highlights Algeria, where nearly every Protestant church has been closed by the government. Amid this crackdown, Pastor Youssef Ourahmane faces prosecution before the country’s Supreme Court for leading Christian worship, with a potential prison sentence.  

The letter also warns that even in democratic societies, Christians increasingly face pressure and punishment for expressing their beliefs. Cases like Päivi Räsänen in Finland and Adam Smith-Connor in the United Kingdom show how legal and social pressures are mounting against Christians, even in places where religious freedom is traditionally protected. 

“The U.S. should stand as a beacon for the fundamental right to religious freedom and a voice for persecuted Christians globally, because if we do not stand, no one else will,” the letter concludes. “We ask that you continue to make the defense of religious freedom internationally a core U.S. foreign policy priority, and that you continue and even elevate your defense of persecuted Christians worldwide.” 

Sie sehen gerade einen Platzhalterinhalt von YouTube. Um auf den eigentlichen Inhalt zuzugreifen, klicken Sie auf die Schaltfläche unten. Bitte beachten Sie, dass dabei Daten an Drittanbieter weitergegeben werden.

Mehr Informationen
Inhalt entsperren Erforderlichen Service akzeptieren und Inhalte entsperren
Images for free use in print or online in relation to this story only

Gebet vor Abtreibungseinrichtung in Regensburg endgültig erlaubt

  • Stadt hebt Auflagen auf – Erfolg für Religions- und Versammlungsfreiheit  
  • ADF International begrüßt Ausgang als „klares Bekenntnis zum Rechtsstaat“ 

Regensburg (6. November 2025) – Ein wichtiger Sieg für Religions- und Versammlungsfreiheit: Nach den erfolgreichen Eilentscheidungen des Verwaltungsgerichts Regensburg und des Bayerischen Verwaltungsgerichtshofs hat die Stadt Regensburg ihre Beschränkungen für Gebetsversammlungen vor einer Abtreibungseinrichtung vollständig aufgehoben. Nach Angaben des anwaltlichen Vertreters geschah dies, weil die Stadt das Hauptverfahren höchstwahrscheinlich verloren hätte. Der Bayerische Verwaltungsgerichtshof stellte in seinem Beschluss klar, dass das Schwangerschaftskonfliktgesetz (SchKG) keine pauschalen Verbotszonen („Bannmeilen“) für Meinungsäußerungen vorsieht. Friedliche Versammlungen sind weiterhin erlaubt – auch im 100-Meter-Radius um Abtreibungseinrichtungen. Der Verein Helfer für Gottes kostbare Kinder Deutschland e.V. darf seine monatlichen Gebetswachen damit auch weiterhin wie gewohnt in rund 40 Metern Entfernung zur Einrichtung abhalten.  

ADF International unterstützte den Verein im Verfahren gemeinsam mit Rechtsanwalt Prof. Dr. Torsten Schmidt (Leisnig), der die rechtliche Vertretung übernahm. Im neuen Bescheid der Stadt Regensburg vom 24. Oktober 2025 übernimmt die Stadt ausdrücklich die Begründung der Gerichte und macht sie sich zu eigen. Damit ist das Verfahren faktisch abgeschlossen – ein vollständiger Erfolg für die Klägerseite. 

„Dieser Ausgang ist ein klares Bekenntnis zum Rechtsstaat: Friedliches Gebet darf nicht unter Generalverdacht gestellt werden. Die Entscheidungen zeigen, dass das Ende 2024 geänderte Bundesgesetz keine pauschalen Verbote vor Ort rechtfertigt. Grundrechte gelten auch vor Abtreibungseinrichtungen.“

- Dr. Felix Böllmann, Leiter der europäischen Rechtsabteilung bei ADF International.

Juristischer Erfolg mit Signalwirkung 

Der Prozessvertreter des Vereins, Rechtsanwalt Prof. Dr. Torsten Schmidt, begrüßte die Entscheidungen als „sehr erfreulich“: 

„Unzulässige Angriffe auf die Religionsfreiheit und die Versammlungsfreiheit konnten abgewehrt werden. Der Vorgang hat allerdings auch erschreckende Züge: Die im Verfahren offengelegten Akten zeigen, dass durch die Bundestagsabgeordnete Dr. Carolin Wagner (SPD) offenbar politischer Druck auf die Stadt ausgeübt wurde, um das Einschreiten gegen die Gebetsvigil zu erzwingen. Skandalös ist, welchen starken Einfluss parteipolitische Seilschaften auf eine zur Neutralität verpflichtete Behörde nehmen konnten. Alarmierend ist zudem, dass heute schon christliche Symbolik oder das Bild eines ungeborenen Kindes als ‚angsteinflößend‘ gelten sollen.“ 

Die Stadt Regensburg hatte im Sommer 2025 unter Berufung auf das Ende 2024 geänderte SchKG eine 100-Meter-Verbotszone um Abtreibungseinrichtungen verhängt. Auch innerhalb der Stadtverwaltung gab es dazu offenbar unterschiedliche Auffassungen: Während das Rechtsamt die Gebetsmahnwachen für rechtmäßig erachtete, ergingen die beschränkenden Auflagen auf Weisung der politischen Spitze, die – nach Aktenlage – ihrerseits auf Druck eines Mitglieds der Bundes-SPD handelte.  

Im gerichtlichen Eilverfahren wurde bestätigt, dass die Auflagen tatsächlich aller Voraussicht nach rechtswidrig waren. Eine parteipolitische Einflussnahme gegen geltendes Recht konnte damit abgewehrt werden. Es bedurfte dazu aber der Anrufung der Gerichte.  

Gerichte bestätigen: Gesetz bietet keine Grundlage für pauschale Verbote 

Das Verwaltungsgericht Regensburg hatte in einer Eilentscheidung bereits am 14. August 2025 entschieden, dass die monatlichen Gebetswachen weiterhin stattfinden dürfen. Der Bayerische Verwaltungsgerichtshof bestätigte dies am 23. September 2025. Beide Gerichte stellten klar, dass das SchKG keine ausreichende Grundlage für pauschale Verbote friedlicher Versammlungen bietet. 

Im Anschluss an diese Entscheidungen hob die Stadt Regensburg am 24. Oktober 2025 die Beschränkungen offiziell auf und erklärte das Verfahren für erledigt. Der Verein stimmte dem zu und beantragte, dass die Stadt die Kosten trägt. 

„Wegweisende Rechtsprechung“ 

Laut Rechtsanwalt Prof. Dr. Schmidt wurde damit eine „wegweisende, versammlungs- und lebensschutzfreundliche Rechtsprechung“ geschaffen. ADF International bewertet das Ergebnis als positives Signal für alle, die ihr Grundrecht auf Religionsausübung friedlich wahrnehmen wollen. 

„Diese Entscheidung schützt die Freiheit der Versammlung, der Meinungsäußerung und der öffentlichen Glaubensbekundung – Grundpfeiler jeder freien Gesellschaft.“ so Dr. Böllmann abschließend. 

Images for free use in print or online in relation to this story only

Scottish politician seeks to criminalise “influencing” a person’s decision about assisted suicide 

  • Scottish Green Party’s Patrick Harvie proposes a censored “buffer zone” around facilities where assisted suicides might take place, preventing family members or concerned individuals from changing a person’s mind 
  • Move echoes abortion “buffer zones” law enacted in Scotland last year, under which a grandmother was arrested for offering a conversation 

EDINBURGH (29 October 2025) – A Scottish parliamentarian and member of the Health Committee, Patrick Harvie MSP, has proposed an amendment to Scotland’s controversial “assisted suicide” bill that would criminalise discussion of suicide prevention  within a large, undefined public area surrounding any building where an assisted suicide might take place. 

The vague proposal would forbid any attempts to “influence” a person’s decision to undergo an assisted suicide, such as through conversation with a family member or the display of a suicide prevention poster.

"It's unthinkable that Scots should be banned on certain streets from offering hope and encouraging someone to choose life, not suicide."

- Lois McLatchie Miller, ADF International

Almost half of those who opted for assisted suicides in Oregon cited concerns about being a perceived “burden on family, friends or caregivers” as a driver for their decision to end their lives, according to public health data released in 2023. 

Concerns for Free Speech

The move echoes the “buffer zones” law put in place in Scotland last year, which criminalises any attempts to “influence” a person’s decision to access abortion services within 200m of every hospital.  

In August, 75-year-old grandmother Rose Docherty became the first person to be arrested under the abortion “buffer zones” law after she peacefully offered consensual conversation, holding a sign reading “Coercion is a crime, here to talk, only if you want”. The U.S. State Department condemned the arrest as „another egregious example of the tyrannical suppression of free speech happening across Europe.“ ADF International is supporting her legal defence as she faces trial in December. 

At the Munich Security Conference in February, U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance criticised the Scottish buffer zones law, summarising that „free speech, I fear, is in retreat“.

Reacting to Harvie’s proposal, Lois McLatchie Miller from ADF International said: 

„It’s unthinkable that Scots should be banned on certain streets from offering hope and encouraging someone to choose life, not suicide.  

How will this impact a doctor’s choice to have a suicide-prevention charity’s poster in their window? How will this impact important conversations between loved ones, eager to convince an elderly wife or a parent that they are not a burden, but a valuable member of the family? 

“Once the principle of a censorial ‘buffer zone’ is approved for one issue, it can easily multiply to more and more issues. We’ve already seen loosely worded abortion ‘buffer zone’ rules be used to arrest a grandmother simply for offering to chat. Now the government seeks to apply the same vague, broad rules to ban speech about assisted suicide. What could be next? Banning parents from „influencing“ their child outside a gender clinic? Banning dissenting speech about foreign regimes around certain embassies? Censorship is always a slippery slope.“ 

Images for free use in print or online in relation to this story only

PICTURED: Rose Docherty, Lois McLatchie Miller